Menu:

 

I had my annual physical due with my gynocologist and I decided to ask her what she thought of the whole 'Sarah Palin was-she-pregnant-or-not' fiasco. I was nervous about it because I had no idea what my doctors reaction would be at those questions. 

I wanted to keep it scientific, not political, so I decided to print out the most relivent pictures of the group that has been posted and use those to ask the questions.  I tried to keep it down to just a few because I didn't want to take up much of her time.  I also decided to cover her face so that if she hasn't seen any of these pictures then she would have no idea who's picture she was seeing.  I wanted to get as honest a rection as possible and to just focus on, could this have been a real pregnancy.

Well, the results were extremely interesting and very relivent to the discussion of, 'was she or wasn't she'.  I invite you to go to the tab of ,'OB GYN shocked!' and see for yourself.

 


Comments

AKPetMom

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:38:39

Hi there, just wanted you to know that I've checked here before and had you saved on my blog list to check and I'm happy to see you posting to your own blog. Keep it up and good work.

 

RW

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:36:07

Hi and good to see you.
A lot of picture analysis went away recently causing a void so Im very glad to see your blog now.

I agree with you that 'most' people dont have a clue about any of this. Mostly you have to be on the tubes to see it and find it.
Showing it to people is some form is a fine idea.

Thx!

 

RW

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:37:44

Hi and good to see you.
A lot of picture analysis went away recently causing a void so Im very glad to see your blog now.

I agree with you that 'most' people dont have a clue about any of this. Mostly you have to be on the tubes to see it and find it.
Showing it to people is some form is a fine idea.

Thx!

this may be duping...

 

RW

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:39:43

For comments mine did not 'seem' to post because the page did not change after the captcha...BUT it did post whether I realized it or not.
Fwiw.

 

Judy

Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:12:09

Good Work! I live in NE GA, too. Perhaps we could get together for a Mudstock event!

 

crystalwolf aka caligrl

Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:55:01

Awesome pics and website! That is great opinion from a REAL OBGYN also. I think a growing amount of people are believing the false pregnancy story, but now its going to be like "why"? Was it just b/c the daughter was 16 1/2 or what? And why say she is preggo again during the campaign? I tell ya this is a "Peyton" place! Keep up the good work!

 

FW

Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:18:29

I found you thru the Immoral Minority blog. Any woman who has given birth knows that SP's bizarre pregnancy and birth story just could not have happened the way she has told it. It is not humanly possible for a 44 year old woman on her her 5th pregnancy to have a flat stomach at 30 weeks. I don't even need an OB's opinion, but I do agree it may get the medical community to pay attention to this.

Additionally no hospital or parent would release a premature (weighing in at a whopping 6+ pounds, a full term wieght I might add) DS baby from the hospital 24 hours after birth. Then said Mother brings him into her office and exposes premature baby to germs at her office 3 days after birth, when most women are still bleeding sore and engorged.

 

Rachel

Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:53:46

Great work. I love the reaction of the OBGYN. Then you should have asked if she would advise a 40+ year old woman carrying a DS baby to seek medical care once her water broke and to NOT fly from TX-Alaksa then drive another hour to a hospital. I think that's another one that would leave them scratching their heads. That's not a "conspiracy" either. It's well documented- right of Palin's mouth.

I love your analysis on the infamous green sweater pic. I might be in the minority but I really think that's 2007. When I first heard about Sarah Palin I was one of those people digging through the internet for information. I remember it very clearly being labeled 2007. So when it was changed to 2006, I thought I was crazy.

 

Littl' Me

Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:38:52

Love your blog, Deb! Just BE SURE TO BE SAFE - stay as anonymous as possible!!!

LOVE the OB/GYNs take! Talking about 'nailing it'!

Rachel: I am with you re. the green sweater pic! I *know* I saw it posted as 2006, and all of a sudden, it is posted as 2007. I also remember reading other blogs (forgot where...:/) mentioning the same stuff, saying they were NOT crazy imagininig stuff!

 

trish in SW FL

Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:03:33

Not sure HOW I did it, but I left the following comment in the "First Post", when I meant to put it in here:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Excellent work, Deb!

If I still went to an OB/GYN, I'd attempt doing the same kind of thing you did. I just don't see how a professional could possibly look at those pics and NOT come to the same conclusions as your doc did!

Being one of the "47 million" uninsured, my medical care consists of visiting an extremely busy poor folks clinic, and I only go there when it's necessary, to get my BP meds re-ordered.

 

Tina in East TN

Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:51:13

This is GREAT work, Deb (LOVE the domain name [grin])! Very clear and convincing. I'm going to send a link to this OB/GYN story to one of my hard-core SP fanatic friends to get his reaction.

Also, the color-coded time line posted at http://tinyurl.com/palintimeline is an eye-opening experience with regards to SP's many "Gates".

 

Lynn in Alaska

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:30:46

Might I suggest that you people get a life - maybe go back to reading National Enquirer

 

mdlw

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:54:51

Well, I have a problem with the picture of Bristol as well.

There are two pictures of the three Palin girls at the governor's mansion that were dated 12-08-06 shortly after SP was elected governor. Now, take those two pictures, than the one with Bristol in the green top and then the other family picture with Track made in Juneau. That should be chronological. And there is a picture from the Alaska State Fair which was held Aug 21-Sept 1, 2007, with Willow and SP (pinkish blazer) and Willow looks the same age as in the picture made in Juneau. Now, two girls in the other family picture have on short sleeved tops...summer?!

And I have a problem with the pictures of Trig as well. First, we have a picture of Sadie with Trig...then with grandma at the hospital. Yet, the baby grandma is holding looks older than the one Sadie is holding. Gets stranger ... take the one from the cover of US Weekly magazine, which I think was dated 05-09-08, which shows SP and Trig both wearing the exact same outfits as the baby shower which was supposedly held on 05-05-08. Trig on the magazine cover looks 6+ weeks old...over a pound heavier than the one Sadie is holding. I am beginning to think that Trig was born well before that wild ride which was to make everyone believe SP actually had a baby and since SP was in Anchorage/Wasilla area from March 14-27, 2008...well, maybe that is why. Thus, if the child happens to be Bristol's than the two family pictures may both actually show Bristol is the mother.

Putting all the pictures up side by side and checking the children's features will tell alot about the timing of the pictures. Hats, blankets and big hands covering the baby seem to be distractions.

Please keep up your excellent work on this project!

 

Joe

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:43:15

Its obvious that the unemployed and uneducated have plenty of idle time on their hands may I suggest you try something more meaningful and productive...like get a job...If its trash you seek then surley you will find it in your own pathetic little lives...May you out live your children!

 

Maryland curious

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:53:38

One of the comments over at Audrey's blog mentioned that SP never walked as if she were pregnant. Is there any video of SP walking in the Feb. 2008-April 2008 timeframe? Also, someone mentioned that she participated in some kind of mountain climb/hike event in February 2008. Would even a very fit pregnant woman walk up a mountain in February in Alaska?

 

Tina in ET

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:29:58

Deb ~ i've been posting this URL all over the web: http://tinyurl.com/shocked-doc

I even sent it to my hardcore Republican mother, who never brought it up to me, but did totally shut up about SP.

(BTW: i've had five kids [all grown, now] and each pregnancy only had one thing in common: i sway-backed waddled.)

 

Tina in ET

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:22:02

I'm going to try to make this link live:

<A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/shocked-doc">http://tinyurl.com/shocked-doc</A>

 

Elle in MI

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:01:07

There is a video of SP walking while pregnant. She was being interviewed by someone, I believe it was in February 2008, and she was wearing high heels. She did not look at all pregnant. Neither did she walk like a pregnant woman. I wish I had the link. But you may find it through Palin's Deceptions (Audrey's blog).

Elle in MI

 

mary

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:49:20

Here's a link to the video of Governor Fraud during her alleged "pregnancy". She's supposed to be 30-32 weeks pregnant during this Feb 2008 vid. Yeah right.
http://tinyurl.com/5q7zp9

Worth noting again, especially to the the brain-dead Palinbot trolls. Palin could make all this speculation go away in two seconds with medical and birth records. She will not because she CANNOT. Simple as that.

 

FEDUP!!!!!

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:44:04

LOL, Mary:"Worth noting again, especially to the the brain-dead Palinbot trolls."...
Unfortunately, it seems the majority (???) of the Repugs believe she is 'THEIR' ticket for 2012. I hope they go for it, and I also hope the Dems (I still call them Whimpocrats, but they are making slowly progress...)will fix our voting system once and for all, and BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION!!! Because, otherwise, I do not want to think about the potential outcome of the next election!

 



Leave a Reply