Palin's Peyton Place

Hi, Excellent layout of website and info. Do you have an email I can send you a note on some info I had sent Audrey a while back about the Palin family photo with Bristol in the green sweater? I did not recieve a reply from Audrey, but it was at the time when a lot of people were revisting that photo and questioning the date.

Here's another website with a lot of information that your readers may find useful:

http://www.palinbabyquestion.com

Please contact me at the above e-mail address.

Also, I suggest that you mail a copy of your ob gyn pictures to Beth Kerttula, Alaska State Capitol room 404 Juneau AK 99801
If you will go to the Mudflats blog you can learn all about the lawsuits she has brought against Palin. I wrote her an e-mail over the weekend telling her I was sending a hard copy package of pictures, but your are far better and with the doctor's comments you present a VERY STRONG case.

I've known from day one that Palin was lying. If you will e-mail me I will tell you all about myself. My don went to North Georgia College in Dahlonega.

If you wish to keep yourself anonymous that's fine with me. Just get a g-mail account. I have lots to tell you.

The story of your OB-Gyn reviewing the pictures and being SO dead certain about what we all believe, too -- cleverly done test, keeping the "belly" anonymous -- remarkable, Deb, good work!

Well, you changed my mind. I knew from the wild ride that Palin did not experience any water breaking. I have twice and my mouth dropped open when I heard that story. I really wanted to believe that Bristol was not the birth mother. But the picture in the green shirt...I have looked at it so many times, but the date said 2006. I thought maybe birth control pills, or period. And another thing that I noticed when you placed those two pictures of Bristol together, and that is Piper. That means that the photo must be much later, in 2007.

Thanks for all your work...and I do hope you will forward as requested above.

Interesting and disturbing, but proves nothing. Women bloat up and swell and increase size differently depending on the child they carry. The process is not uniform. You know that surely? The more obvious photos are worthless because we only have your word about their dating. You'll have to do better if you want this to be taken seriously.

Great job, Deb! Keep it up! I LOVE your OB/GYN story! (Wish that MK had been able to post something like that.)

Just a friendly reminder: DO NOT reveal your idendity! See what happened to MK...

Thank you Deb,
It was great to read your chronology of your interest in the story. Mine was very similar. Things just got weirder and weirder.
Your photo collage is the best I've seen, and the most convincing. In some blogs this type of comparison gets lost in the tirades.
What becomes very interesting now is the number of accomplices that are involved, changing stories and dates.
Some, ADN for example, seem to count on a level of public trust. The doctor certainly counts on a level of personal trust. If Palin is actually able to manipulate so many, she becomes much more fearful than I have ever imagined.
If she's been telling the truth all along, it's as easy as providing some clear evidence.

Thanks for your efforts to keep this issue of credibility out there.

Well, I guess further proof that she is not telling the truth is the fact that she lied brazenly to the RNC about not being able to come to DC this weekend, because she could not leave Alaska in the middle of the legislature... and then she shows up in DC at the $200/plate by-invitation-only dinner, probably on the invitation of Malek...

Deb, I have to admit, when all this baby conspiracy stuff started up, I thought, wow, there are some weird and cruel people in this world. I actually defended the Palins. I just couldn't wrap my mind around the idea that the Gov would go to such bizarre lengths to hide her daughter having a baby. But as time went on, I came to realize that something strange had happened, I just wasn't sure what, because I didn't have a handle on different time lines and didn't realize some of the things that had gone on like Bristol transferring to West High, but apparently not attending school there for long. After reading a few of the sites such as yours, things started clicking.

The most obvious thing to me was that Sarah Palin could have put a stop to all these stories any time she wanted by producing a birth certificate and proving all the conspiracy theorists to be loonies. But she hasn't. If she truly delivered Trigg as in the story that was reported, what does she have to lose by producing a birth certificate? Nothing, but the whole family has everything to gain. To me, that says that a birth certificate would blow the lid off things and damage her credibility forever. That's the same reason I believe she hasn't released the e-mails and all the testimony in the Troopergate affair.

But for her to go to such lengths as to fake a pregnancy and a delivery, there had to be a bigger reason than to protect her daughter from what people might think. After all that didn't come into play with the pregnancy that resulted in Tripp. (Unless she just plain figured she'd never get away with a second fake pregnancy)

So who was she protecting if she actually faked the pregnancy of Trigg? Could it be Trigg himself? I have two theories on how that could be, but don't have enough inside info to figure which if either could be true.

The first is..... Trigg is supposed to be a Downs Syndrome baby. Maybe they were just gonna let Bristol cool for a while when she was sent to her Aunt's and announce late in the pregnancy she was expecting. Then in the meantime, during prenatal exams they discovered the Downs Syndrome. Now would Bristol have been financially able to care for a Downs Syndrome baby? Did she have insurance that would have helped get him the best care? Would Sarah's coverage with the State have covered her daughter's son and his problems? If not, maybe Sarah and Todd decided To fake the pregnancy and adopt Trigg to get Trigg covered under Sarah's insurance. As strange as that would be, it makes some sense. I can also see why they wouldn't want it to be public info. Might not play well with the constituents.

The second theory is that Trigg might not be a Downs Syndrome baby, but a Fetal Alcohol Syndrome baby, with the rest of the theory basically the same as the first. From her MySpace account, we know Bristol did a lot of partying and drinking. Maybe a lot of it happened before she realized she was pregnant resulting in a FAS baby. I can see where the family would want to cover that up too.

Anyway, just some thoughts that I never thought I would ever contemplate. But the actions of the Palins just don't add up including the story of Sarah's "pregnancy".

If they are really honest and really wanted people to shut up and leave them alone, there is no reason not to release both birth certificates.

One last thought. Sherry Johnston. She would appear to be the weak link in all these stories especially as she appears to be persona non grata with the Palins. I'm still wondering where she got the money to hire Rex Butler to defend her on the drug charges when she was so poor she needed a public defender. Could she have gone to the Palins and gotten them to help her get a "better" lawyer, to keep her mouth shut about what she knows?

I'm starting to sound like a crackpot now.

I don't know about FAS... Trig looked very much like a DS baby in the GVS interview, with his tongue sticking out, and his eyes bugging... Also, his head is not small like a FAS baby would be, IMHO...